Secret Principles of Immortality, Edition 26

The subject of this article is computer-related immortality, and how it can be generated using categories.

In the previous article I arrived at eight stages, in which it was determined that the philosopher is 'great,' but not the ultimate stage. Two stages lie beyond philosopher, defined as 'wisdom,' and 'the ultimate.'

The eight total stages were as follows:

(a) Curiosity
(b) Ambition
(c) Truth
(d) Practicality
(e) Soulfulness
(f) Greatness
(g) Wisdom
(h) The Ultimate

In this article I will begin to define in what ways the eight stages represent technical aspects of immortality, such as reflections on technical symbolic objects, technical accesses to some higher technical awareness, or by implication or use of technicalities, technical prowess over dimensions of technical reality.

In order to do this, it may be necessary to introduce some further concepts, although I anticipate that the reader will find these concepts conducive for concepts of immortality, perhaps only in a technical age, but possibly by extension, into other ages (such as ages of time travel) as well.

First, I will interpret the earlier eight for practical purposes, using the conventional [A-G, B-H, C-E, D-F] comparability, as in comparing two diagrams in three dimensions.

The result is the following simplification:

[A] Curious wisdom
[B] Ambition of ultimatum
[C] Truth of the soul
[D] Practical greatness

I will translate this in an interface context to mean:

(A) Prescribed change
(B) Principle of potential
(C) Exceptional reality
(D) Practical difference

The 'prescribed change' may be a way in which certain words and descriptions fit the person, like a title, or prescription. Now, let us say that 'principle of potential' means the source cause of the individual. The 'exceptional reality' is the external attributes of the person. The 'practical difference' is the sense of being a god. In that sense, it is abbreviated. But we have not yet found the objects which represent the conditions of the person as an experience.

Let us say the first element is called a Prescription. It is the title and immortal proof-plan of the individual.

The second element could be called an Indexical or Index, a kind of complicated history-tree which tabulates the most relevant details and graphs, as if they are emergent elements from history. The third element might simply be a Temple, or technologically, an Itemizer which can also be called a 'Manifesto': some sort of collection of objects or activities, such as luck, crystals, certificates, money, etc. which contribute to realizing the potential of the person. This is a kind of womb, or sacred place for the person. The fourth element is an active version of the third, and might be called an Oracle. It finds purposes in practical objects by providing advice, guidance, or insight. For some individuals, the Oracle is not very tangible, whereas for others it has fully manifested as a person, program, or corporation. The source of the Oracle may even change from time to time. Sometimes the best advice from the Oracle seems self-generated.

Now there are the four potentials so far described:

1. Prescription
2. Index
3. Manifesto
4. Oraculus

Another view of these would be to call them:

1. Program
2. Application
3. Data
4. Parser

But note some details: the parser doesn't have total control, except in virtual reality. 'Data' is a complex concept, that may include some level of parsing on its own. 'Application' in this case means an interpreter for meaningful results. By 'program' what is meant is simply the perfect agenda or logic of the individual.

Is this too abstract? These are concrete concepts in a technological realm. But are we certain that they relate with immortality?

Well, consider how spookily ambiguous the concept of recursion is in this four-step tree. With some analysis, any one of these concepts could be recursive. The parser, in an object-oriented system can be recursive when multiple agencies are involved. We know data can be recursive when it does parsing. Applications refer to programs, but involve a certain amount of imbedded recursion, e.g. anticipating moves to the fullest extent possible. A program is the most obvious recursive object: in an object-oriented setting, it completed prescribed loops which can be instantaneously generated from a set of construction tables.

Let's try the recursive approach. What are the real entities involved in this four-step tree?

A. Construction tables
B. Operating instructions
C. Paradigmatics (motivations)
D. Reconstruction (modified entities)
E. Mapping
F. Dimension
G. Reference
H. Interpretation
I. Typification
J. Process
K. Symbolism
L. Systemization
M. Channeling
N. Gating
O. Synergizing
P. Producing

Thus, there are four stages for every single original stage. The result is something like what is necessary for an immortal computer which could handle life instructions.

Now, let's apply categorical deduction, and see the results:

[A-K, B-L, C-I, D-J
E-O, F-P, G-M, H-N]

A. Construction tables of symbolism.
B. Operating instructions for systems.
C. Paradigmatic types.
D. Reconstructed processes.
E. Mapping and synergizing.
F. Dimensional products.
G. Reference channeling.
H. Interpretation gating.

Now let's apply categorical deduction again, and see the results:

[A-G, B-H, C-E, D-F]

A. Channeling construction tables for reference symbolism.
B. Gating operating instructions to interpret systems.
C. Synergizing paradigms for mapping-types.
D. Producing reconstructions of dimensional processes.

Now let's apply categorical deduction again, to reach binary form:

[A-C, B-D]

1. Map types of channeling construction to synergize paradigms for reference symbolism.
2. Process dimensions for gating operations instructions to produce reconstructions of interpreted systems.

Now, to unify the two processes:

[A-B]

1/1: Produce reconstructions of interpreted systems to map types of channeling construction to process dimensions for gating operations instructions to synergize paradigms for reference symbolism.

Perhaps that means something for immortality.

In the future, I will reconsider older articles, and introduce new topics, perhaps about technology, and perhaps not.

So ends the 26th Edition of the Secret Principles of Immortality.

Nathan Coppedge is in some capacity a philosopher, artist, inventor, and poet. His Amazon author page can be found at the following link:

http://www.Amazon.com/author/nathancoppedge

Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/?expert=Nathan_L_Coppedge